Definitions
from Wiktionary, Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.
- verb Third-person singular simple present indicative form of
psych .
Etymologies
Sorry, no etymologies found.
Support
Help support Wordnik (and make this page ad-free) by adopting the word psychs.
Examples
-
Wikipedia did lead me to an apparently explanation of an odd reference by one of the pro-scientology commenters who appeared here, something about blaming "psychs" for the comments here.
-
But you are also assuming that you can have accurate critical information about a field like psychiatry ( "psychs", I guess, in your jargon) based on second-hand sources, and that you can trust an exclusively negative source like scientology.
-
But you are also assuming that you can have accurate critical information about a field like psychiatry ( "psychs", I guess, in your jargon) based on second-hand sources, and that you can trust an exclusively negative source like scientology.
-
And yet the scientologists have a rather expansive claim about what psychiatry ( "psychs", if I get it) is up to, without providing any evidence to support grand theories such as that they manipulate the news media, and though scientologists refuse to have anything to do with it (thus presuming that you can actually have detailed knowledge about a subject and its aims second-hand).
-
And yet the scientologists have a rather expansive claim about what psychiatry ( "psychs", if I get it) is up to, without providing any evidence to support grand theories such as that they manipulate the news media, and though scientologists refuse to have anything to do with it (thus presuming that you can actually have detailed knowledge about a subject and its aims second-hand).
Denver Post: News: Breaking: Local xenubarb 2010
-
But you are also assuming that you can have accurate critical information about a field like psychiatry ( "psychs", I guess, in your jargon) based on second-hand sources, and that you can trust an exclusively negative source like scientology.
-
But you are also assuming that you can have accurate critical information about a field like psychiatry ( "psychs", I guess, in your jargon) based on second-hand sources, and that you can trust an exclusively negative source like scientology.
-
But you are also assuming that you can have accurate critical information about a field like psychiatry ( "psychs", I guess, in your jargon) based on second-hand sources, and that you can trust an exclusively negative source like scientology.
-
And yet the scientologists have a rather expansive claim about what psychiatry ( "psychs", if I get it) is up to, without providing any evidence to support grand theories such as that they manipulate the news media, and though scientologists refuse to have anything to do with it (thus presuming that you can actually have detailed knowledge about a subject and its aims second-hand).
-
The 'foreign dictats' are like the psychs psychiatrists and psychologists that Scientology supreme leader demonises.
Comments
Log in or sign up to get involved in the conversation. It's quick and easy.