Usery

National League of Cities v. Usery, 426 U.S. 833, 840 (1976); see Cleveland v. United States, 329 U.S.

The Volokh Conspiracy » Destroying the Constitution’s Structure is not Constitutional 2010

Usery than it does to the Lopez-Morrison brand of Commerce Clause federalism.

The Volokh Conspiracy » President Obama Claimed that the Individual Mandate is Not a Tax 2010

Ultimately, the next step must deal with Usery, which the Catholic Church has always and everywhere condemned.

Archive 2008-02-01 Athanasius 2008

Hilaire Belloc gives an excellent description of Usery, it is money charged for money, rather than money charged for a productive loan.

Archive 2008-02-01 Athanasius 2008

Yet Usery is the source of the power of modern banking institutions, and it is the agent that maintains capital in the hands of but a few.

"Island Hopping" to Distributism Athanasius 2008

Ultimately, the next step must deal with Usery, which the Catholic Church has always and everywhere condemned.

"Island Hopping" to Distributism Athanasius 2008

Yet Usery is the source of the power of modern banking institutions, and it is the agent that maintains capital in the hands of but a few.

Archive 2008-02-01 Athanasius 2008

Hilaire Belloc gives an excellent description of Usery, it is money charged for money, rather than money charged for a productive loan.

"Island Hopping" to Distributism Athanasius 2008

Usery 1976 —only to abandon them later as analytically unsound.

Archive 2007-04-01 Ann Althouse 2007

During his first decade on the bench the most important states'-rights case for which Rehnquist wrote the majority opinion was National League of Cities v. Usery, in 1976; that case heralded the beginning of the so-called federalism revolution, which imposed meaningful limits on congressional power for the first time since the New Deal.

Rehnquist the Great? 2005