arguer

This imperative will often be combined with a defensive assumption that the arguer is only exercising linguistic fluency in a hostile attempt to remind the anti-intellectual of their inferior articulacy.

Archive 2009-03-01 Hal Duncan 2009

This imperative will often be combined with a defensive assumption that the arguer is only exercising linguistic fluency in a hostile attempt to remind the anti-intellectual of their inferior articulacy.

Arguing With Geeks 6 Hal Duncan 2009

I guess you're more of a stick your fingers in your ear and repeat yourself over and over "arguer".

Buffalo Pundit 2009

I guess you're more of a stick your fingers in your ear and repeat yourself over and over "arguer".

Buffalo Pundit 2009

I guess you're more of a stick your fingers in your ear and repeat yourself over and over "arguer".

Buffalo Pundit 2009

I guess you're more of a stick your fingers in your ear and repeat yourself over and over "arguer".

Buffalo Pundit 2009

I guess you're more of a stick your fingers in your ear and repeat yourself over and over "arguer".

Buffalo Pundit 2009

I guess you're more of a stick your fingers in your ear and repeat yourself over and over "arguer".

Buffalo Pundit 2009

I guess you're more of a stick your fingers in your ear and repeat yourself over and over "arguer".

Buffalo Pundit 2009

Alan Wolfe has an interesting essay on liberal hawks (via Jon Chait) that I think winds up going a bit awry by running together humanitarian arguments about the desirability of military intervention in particular (whether or not the arguer wanted to invade Iraq), with national security arguments about the desirability of invading Iraq that were offered by liberals (whether or not the arguer was making any distinctively “liberal” appeals).

Matthew Yglesias » Alan Wolfe on Liberal Hawks 2009