Definitions
from Wiktionary, Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.
- verb Present participle of
intercept .
Etymologies
Sorry, no etymologies found.
Support
Help support Wordnik (and make this page ad-free) by adopting the word intercepting.
Examples
-
Christopher said: I believe advice from an attorney that your actions are lawful under FISA would go to negate the mens rea requirement that, under 50 USC 1809, requires the government to prove you acted intentionally in intercepting communications contrary to that statute.
Balkinization 2007
-
I believe advice from an attorney that your actions are lawful under FISA would go to negate the mens rea requirement that, under 50 USC 1809, requires the government to prove you acted intentionally in intercepting communications contrary to that statute.
Balkinization 2007
-
Christopher said: I believe advice from an attorney that your actions are lawful under FISA would go to negate the mens rea requirement that, under 50 USC 1809, requires the government to prove you acted intentionally in intercepting communications contrary to that statute.
Balkinization 2007
-
I believe advice from an attorney that your actions are lawful under FISA would go to negate the mens rea requirement that, under 50 USC 1809, requires the government to prove you acted intentionally in intercepting communications contrary to that statute.
Balkinization 2007
-
I believe advice from an attorney that your actions are lawful under FISA would go to negate the mens rea requirement that, under 50 USC 1809, requires the government to prove you acted intentionally in intercepting communications contrary to that statute.
Balkinization 2007
-
I believe advice from an attorney that your actions are lawful under FISA would go to negate the mens rea requirement that, under 50 USC 1809, requires the government to prove you acted intentionally in intercepting communications contrary to that statute.
Balkinization 2007
-
I believe advice from an attorney that your actions are lawful under FISA would go to negate the mens rea requirement that, under 50 USC 1809, requires the government to prove you acted intentionally in intercepting communications contrary to that statute.
Balkinization 2007
-
I believe advice from an attorney that your actions are lawful under FISA would go to negate the mens rea requirement that, under 50 USC 1809, requires the government to prove you acted intentionally in intercepting communications contrary to that statute.
Balkinization 2007
-
Christopher said: I believe advice from an attorney that your actions are lawful under FISA would go to negate the mens rea requirement that, under 50 USC 1809, requires the government to prove you acted intentionally in intercepting communications contrary to that statute.
Balkinization 2007
-
I believe advice from an attorney that your actions are lawful under FISA would go to negate the mens rea requirement that, under 50 USC 1809, requires the government to prove you acted intentionally in intercepting communications contrary to that statute.
Balkinization 2007
Comments
Log in or sign up to get involved in the conversation. It's quick and easy.