paleothermometry

For the borehole paleothermometry climate-reconstruction technique, perhaps a more relevant metric is the standard uncertainty of the relative temperature measurements which ranged 1.8 – 2.0 mK at Taylor Dome.

The Mysterious Taylor Dome Borehole « Climate Audit 2007

Confident paleothermometry is provided by site-specific calibrations using ice-isotopic ratios, borehole temperatures, and gas-isotopic ratios.

Some Ice Cores in NAS – Antarctic « Climate Audit 2006

We show that the climate history they depict is consistent with what we see from isotopic paleothermometry.

Monbiot v Monckton Round Two « Climate Audit 2006

We show that the climate history they depict is consistent with what we see from isotopic paleothermometry.

What is the evidence against warmer MWP? « Climate Audit 2006

We show that the climate history they depict is consistent with what we see from isotopic paleothermometry.

IPCC and Glaciers « Climate Audit 2006

References that are never used to validate ice core paleothermometry:

Some Ice Cores in NAS – Antarctic « Climate Audit 2006

We show that the climate history they depict is consistent with what we see from isotopic paleothermometry.

Road Map #3 « Climate Audit 2006

The main document regarding errors in Mg/Ca paleothermometry seems to be Core top calibration of Mg/Ca in tropical foraminifera: Refining paleotemperature estimation, Petra S.

Warmest in a Millll-yun Years « Climate Audit 2006

“Growth and composition of high-Mg calcite in the skeleton of a Bermudian gorgonian Plexaurella dichotoma: Potential for paleothermometry”

Pollack and Schrag at the NAS Panel « Climate Audit 2006

Paul, you mentioned some thoughts on a new paleothermometry method that you sought funding for.

Four Hunnnnnn-dred Years « Climate Audit 2006