postmodification

And this is likely to be reinforced whenever the item turns up within an of-postmodification, as in:

On the rich's DC 2009

And this is likely to be reinforced whenever the item turns up within an of-postmodification, as in:

Archive 2009-04-01 DC 2009

This only works with postmodification: premodifying genitives disallow the: we can't say I'm studying the Aristotle's philosophy.

On the, again DC 2008

And with postmodification the situation is as above: I'm studying the trees of Australia.

Archive 2008-12-01 DC 2008

And with postmodification the situation is as above: I'm studying the trees of Australia.

On the, again DC 2008

This is a restrictive postmodification, so the whole thing has to be taken as the subject, if meaning is to be respected.

On who(m)ever DC 2008

Note that when used with postmodification, the is fine, because the of-phrase in effect acts as a way of identifying a subclass, and thus changes the noun into something specific: I'm studying the philosophy of Aristotle.

Archive 2008-12-01 DC 2008

The postmodification won't affect the case of the pronoun.

On who(m)ever DC 2008

This only works with postmodification: premodifying genitives disallow the: we can't say I'm studying the Aristotle's philosophy.

Archive 2008-12-01 DC 2008

I think it's because the postmodification I find alters the semantics of the subject, allowing an uncountable interpretation.

On all and all DC 2008