pseudohistorians

I´ve listened and read so much apologetic trash coming from theologically driven pseudohistorians like Witherington, Wright and Bauckham that I think I am pretty good by now of sniffing out rotten fish.

HANDS Across the Godhead? James F. McGrath 2010

Neil makes it sound like it is only the pseudohistorians in the biblical guild who use criteria like the one of embarrassment or dissimilarity to reconstruct history.

Mythicism and Historicism as Theories (and an Altar Call to Take a Leap of Doubt) James F. McGrath 2010

His handling of matters like GJohn´s relationship to the synoptics or the degree of historicity in the gospel traditions a far cry from pseudohistorians like Richard Bauckham are excellent.

Lincoln's Commentary on the Gospel of John James F. McGrath 2010

'Neil makes it sound like it is only the pseudohistorians in the biblical guild who use criteria like the one of embarrassment or dissimilarity to reconstruct history.'

Mythicism and Historicism as Theories (and an Altar Call to Take a Leap of Doubt) James F. McGrath 2010

And Keeners talk about not ruling out miracles because some philosophers say we shouldn´t is the usual apologetic ploy used by all Christian pseudohistorians from bishop Wright to Keener.

Keener on the Gospels and the Historical Jesus James F. McGrath 2010

But as Bart D. Ehrman ably demonstrates, the stories were all bogus, confected by the pseudohistorians of their day.

Books That Emphatically Debunk Pseudohistory 2008