zoologique

Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744–1829), in Philosophie zoologique, gave the most complete explanation of his theory of evolution.

1809 2001

R. Acher, “Évolution des Structures des hormones Neuro - hypophysaires,” La Spécificité zoologique des Hormones hypophysaires et leurs activités, Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, No. 177, (Paris, 1969).

Dictionary of the History of Ideas STUART A. KAUFFMAN 1968

A basic aim of Erasmus Darwin in his Zoonomia (1794-96), of Lamarck in his Phi - losophie zoologique (1809), and somewhat later, of

EVOLUTIONISM THOMAS A. GOUDGE 1968

Philosophie zoologique (1809) had forged the link be - tween a specific theory of evolution and the notion that physicochemical forces continue even now to produce spontaneously such rudimentary organisms as infusoria and algae.

SPONTANEOUS GENERATION ARAM VARTANIAN 1968

In the first part of the _Philosophie zoologique_ Lamarck is largely pre-occupied with the problem of whether species are really distinct, or do not rather grade insensibly into one another.

Form and Function A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology

A great part of both the _Philosophie zoologique_ and the introduction to the _Animaux sans Vertèbres_ is given up to the exposition of a materialistic psychology of animals and man, based entirely upon this hypothesis of nervous fluids.

Form and Function A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology

His speculative work on biology is contained in three publications, the small book entitled _Considérations sur l'organisation des corps vivants_ (1802), the larger work of 1809, the _Philosophie zoologique_, and the introductory matter to his _Animaux sans Vertèbres_

Form and Function A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology

[126] In his _Principes de philosophie zoologique_, a collection of answers made by Geoffroy, in the discussions of the _Académie des

The Heavenly Father Lectures on Modern Atheism Ernest Naville

_Philosophie zoologique_, but the exposition is diffuse and disconnected; it is better in giving an account of it to follow the more concise, mature and general exposition which he gives in the

Form and Function A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology

What he wrote in the _Philosophie zoologique_ is here repeated in the work of 1816 with little modification.

Form and Function A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology