Yes, but you're right. Dork out implies a certain content that's not effectively true for this page. On the other hand, history dork out may not make much sense to anyone but me, and there are precious few (IMHO) Wordie pages that could honestly carry such a tag, but it's far more accurate.
Now, if we had a word geek tag, we'd have to go around tagging almost everything around here. *ponders*
I like sionnach's original observation about the 'ill-fated, palindromic, former president Menem', as if being a palindrome should somehow bring enough good fortune to ward off national and international crises ... what faith we have in the power of words!
Not averted in entire; merely averted from the 1860s. Slavery had to go one way or another; but under better leadership from the 15th president it might have gone quite a bit less bloodily.
As for Coolidge, I can only repeat what was said of him by a friend when told that he had been nominated vice-president. "But that's horrible!" he said. "I've known Cal Coolidge all my life, and he is the luckiest dog you've ever met. Harding's going to die or get assassinated or something!" I don't particularly think you can blame Coolidge really for all that happened later. Nobody saw it coming. Nobody wanted him to do anything. He, serving the will of the people, didn't do anything. I'm also somewhat of the opinion that the attempts to fix the Depression rather lengthened it. But I gave up debating politics a long time ago, when I became an apathetic anarchomonarchotheocratic anticonstitutionalist.
Nothing went wrong during Coolidge's time? What about the mechanization of farms, evictions and overfarming laying the groundwork for the Dust Bowl? What about the rampant speculation that led to the stock market crash of 1929 that presaged the Great Depression?
Also, I respectfully take issue with the fact that the Civil War could have been averted in entire. But it's mighty pleasant conversing with you. :)
No offense taken; and I certainly don't intend to lay the entire Civil War on Buchanan's doorstep. I still feel that a sufficiently strong leader could have either prevented the war in entire, or made the North's situation a good bit better than it ended up being. Just as not the entire blame for the Iraq War can be laid on Bush's doorstep.
Doing nothing as president can be really good -- I cite Coolidge as an example of somebody who did nothing for near six years while nothing went wrong. If you have crisis unfolding under you, like Buchanan, it can be awful.
No way. No one can blame Buchanan for the Civil War. I can fault Buchanan for a lot of things--doing nothing as one state after another seceded, as well as being a lame-ass president for his entire term instead of just the last few months--but you can't lay the whole war at his door, because you can't lay it at any one person's.
Rampant corruption and cronyism? Man, Bush has got nothing on Grant's administration. Or Harding's. Bad as things are now--and I'm as angry as anyone about it--they were far worse then. Seriously. And rolig, they only seem innocuous now because it's decades past the time when anyone's thinking about their legacy. (We're still thinking about Nixon's.)
W.H. Harrison was president for two months. How can you complain about him? Do you mean Benjamin Harrison, by chance?
Let's not forget Polk, that rat-bastard who started a war no one wanted. Or McKinley, the annexing fool.
My favorite fact about Calvin Coolidge is that he took a nap every afternoon while in office. Imagine having the time to do that in your real life, without even imagining the president's life. Crikey.
Hey, this page has really dorked out. Sorry about that, those of you who don't enjoy watching Presidential Smackdown. And Milosrdentsvi, or anyone else, please don't take these comments as attacks in any way. I'm just shooting the shit, as they say.
Come on! Those are a study in genius and honesty compared with Buchanan, Harding, Grant, Pierce, and the redoubtable William Henry Harrison (although truth be told, he accomplished about as much as Coolidge, the chief crime which can be urged against him being that he was not bright enough to come in out of the rain).
Buchanan particularly. If Bush by dishonesty got us into the Iraq War, Buchanan by cowardice and incompetence got us into the Civil War.
The local pronunciation of this word is something like "Ssshhhetta" (rhymes with "Jetta"). It means something like a jinxed person, or someone who brings bad luck. A synonym is mufa ("moo-fah").
Apparently, this is the term used by most Argentines when referring to the infamous(?), ill-fated, palindromic, former president Menem, to whom the economic collapse of late 2001 is attributed (due to his U.S./World Bank/Big Capitalism - pleasing ways). He is held in such superstitious contempt that many people refuse to refer to him by name; instead the term "el Yeta" is used, in a kind of Voldemortian reverse homage.
(edited to correct the spelling of mufa, and "Voldemortian", though I reserve the right to change the latter back again, way too lazy to look it up)