nofollow

I think a major problem with the nofollow is that people think that by not using this attribute, you “trust” the site you are linking to.

Google Steps Up Efforts to Identify Paid Links 2007

As you probably have already realized I do not use or believe in nofollow!

Time to Say Goodbye to the NoFollow Tag? 2007

A link without a nofollow is not like stamping a “Guarantee” on that site but it seems like that is what Google is asking anyone who links anywhere to do – Guarantee that the site they are linking to has some specific value – and that REALLY can never be determined because no business is perfect.

Google Steps Up Efforts to Identify Paid Links 2007

I've not tried experimenting with such variations, but I'd be surprised if Google did take it to mean "nofollow" -- it's not as if it's a difficult attribute to master.

unknown title 2009

Yes, I think rel = nofollow is what you’re after then.

Scripting News for 1/24/2007 « Scripting News Annex 2007

Absolutely the big problem with nofollow is that there’s so many differing opinions on how to use it.

Time to Say Goodbye to the NoFollow Tag? 2007

And then, there’s the issue of whether nofollow is really for combating spam, and if so why is Google now telling everyone to use it for paid links too.

Time to Say Goodbye to the NoFollow Tag? 2007

What Google did was invent a new tag called nofollow which means that links with this tag do not get any ranking boost for Google.

Website update: Spam defenses improved « Climate Audit 2006

And nofollow, which is a roughly analogous initiative, came together in just a few days, with the involvement of dozens of different people.

The Social Impacts of Software Choices - Anil Dash 2005

I want stop them to do it by add tag nofollow only to some link (from a list).

phpBB.com bipenett 2010