paraconsistency

This position is sometimes called weak paraconsistency in the literature, and opposed to dialetheism, taken as a ˜strongly™ paraconsistent view.

Dialetheism Priest, Graham 2008

(A classical defence of a dialetheic approach to paraconsistency.)

Dialetheism Priest, Graham 2008

However, dialetheism should also be clearly distinguished from paraconsistency (see Berto 2007a, Ch. 5).

Dialetheism Priest, Graham 2008

(Includes an ample discussion of the dialetheic approach to paraconsistency and its wider outcomes within abstract sciences.)

Dialetheism Priest, Graham 2008

(An account of dialetheism and paraconsistency in the history of philosophy.)

Dialetheism Priest, Graham 2008

The core thought behind paraconsistency is to provide logics that do not permit one to infer anything indiscriminately from inconsistent premises.

Dialetheism Priest, Graham 2008

While Aristotle is clearly not a dialetheist, it is not clear where he stands on the issue of paraconsistency.

Aristotle on Non-contradiction Gottlieb, Paula 2007

In the rest of this article, 1) we will start by explaining the connection between dialetheism and other important related concepts, such as the ones of trivialism and paraconsistency.

Dialetheism Priest, Graham 2008

Sometimes, a further sub-distinction is made between strong paraconsistency and dialetheism (see Priest, Beall and Armour-Garb,

Dialetheism Priest, Graham 2008