from Wiktionary, Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.

  • noun Plural form of zap.
  • verb Third-person singular simple present indicative form of zap.


Sorry, no etymologies found.


Help support Wordnik (and make this page ad-free) by adopting the word zaps.



Log in or sign up to get involved in the conversation. It's quick and easy.

  • Spaz in reverse.

    July 22, 2007

  • Seen here.

    "More alarmingly, the dreaded "zaps" have arrived. I'd read about these on the Paxil Database, a site for self-proclaimed Paxil victims, but I thought they were made up—there are so many hypochondriacs on the Web." (Seth Stevenson, "Extroverted Like Me," Slate, June 18, 2006)

    March 31, 2009

  • Hmmm. This article just feeds in to my preexisting conviction that, where brain chemistry is concerned, an unmedicated life is preferable, as much as possible. I attribute this to growing up with a mother who was a doctor (basically, to get even the remotest sympathy or attention, we kids had to be either near death, or have visible lesions). The odd thing is that this conviction has remained, despite 25 years working in the pharmaceutical industry. Go figure.

    But "social anxiety disorder" always had that aura of being a "disease" that had its origins more in the cupidity of big pharma than as any reflection of objective reality.

    And those withdrawal symptoms certainly didn't sound like a picnic either.

    March 31, 2009

  • I've never heard of Paxil before. Is it still available? Stevenson makes it sound like rather a crappy drug all round.

    March 31, 2009

  • Yes, it's still available.

    I think it really depends on who's taking the drug and why. I've heard of people who not only do wonderfully on it, but swear by it--and that's probably true of many of the newer antidepressants.

    The author of this article clearly didn't "need" to take such a drug; he simply wanted to see what it would do for him--whereas many people who use antidepressants are taking them for a diagnosed disease (such as clinical depression).

    March 31, 2009

  • reesetee makes an excellent point. Clinical depression is a well-defined disease, and there are undoubtedly people who benefit from taking Paxil for that condition. Where things become problematic, I think, is when companies try to expand their market by defining "disorders" of a more nebulous kind (e.g. "shyness" as a disorder, rather than just a personality trait).

    March 31, 2009

  • So maybe here is a good place to ask: is restless leg syndrome real?

    *prepares to dodge thrown items*

    March 31, 2009

  • In my (sleepless) experience, yes.

    March 31, 2009